Abstract
To recover the structure and functionality of a deforested ecosystem, two strategies of ecological restoration are considered: active restoration, which eliminates the disturbance agents and implements strategies to accelerate site recovery, and passive restoration, which eliminates disturbance agents, allowing natural regeneration to occur. Prior to choosing passive restoration, a field evaluation of the potential for natural regeneration is important. In this context, seedling and sapling density as well as patterns of recruitment and survival are appropriate indicators of restoration potential. In the present study, we deduced the potential of sacred fir (Abies religiosa) forest of the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve to recover by natural regeneration through seedling and sapling density and mortality, since A. religiosa is the dominant tree species in wintering sites of monarch butterfly. In 2015, we evaluated seedling density in 53 sites along an elevational gradient (3050-3550 m above sea level; m a.s.l.). There was a higher density of seedlings and saplings established in canopy gaps, compared to sites under dense forest canopy. Seedling recruitment was higher in sites at intermediate elevations (3050 to 3300 m a.s.l.) than in those at higher elevations. In a second survey, we studied A. religiosa seedling mortality over the dry season of 2016 to identify the environmental variables that cause the high seedling mortality and very low recruitment. Recently emerged seedling mortality was 49.2% at the end of the dry season (June 2016). The highest monthly mortality (14.3%) was recorded in April, a dry and warm month with the lowest values of moss thickness and soil moisture. We found no negative effects of moss layer on seedling mortality; indeed, moss appears to slow soil moisture reduction at the critical end of the warm and dry season. Soil and moss moisture values in April seem to be a critical factor for A. religiosa seedling recruitment, and we expect this condition will deteriorate under projected climatic change scenarios. Thus, the potential of MBBR A. religiosa forest to recover by passive restoration is highly constrained and will require management actions to achieve successful restoration outcomes.
Highlights
The sacred fir (Abies religiosa) is a conifer native to Mexico
One of the most emblematic Abies religiosa forests in Mexico is found in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve (MBBR), which acts as refuge and habitat for the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexipus L.) that evades the winter conditions of Canada and the United States by annually migrating south to a few mountainsides in central Mexico (Honey-Rosés et al, 2018)
In September and October of 2015, natural regeneration of A. religiosa seedlings was monitored along an elevational gradient (3050 to 3550 m a.s.l) in the MBBR
Summary
The sacred fir (Abies religiosa) is a conifer native to Mexico. It distributes in the mountainous areas (2100 to 3600 m a.s.l.) in central Mexico, presenting monospecific forests between 3000 and 3300 m a.s.l. (Rzedowski, 2006). The sacred fir (Abies religiosa) is a conifer native to Mexico It distributes in the mountainous areas (2100 to 3600 m a.s.l.) in central Mexico, presenting monospecific forests between 3000 and 3300 m a.s.l. One of the most emblematic Abies religiosa forests in Mexico is found in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve (MBBR), which acts as refuge and habitat for the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexipus L.) that evades the winter conditions of Canada and the United States by annually migrating south to a few mountainsides in central Mexico (Honey-Rosés et al, 2018). The Reserve is threatened by various political, social and economic issues that lead to environmental degradation associated with logging activities, expansion of the agricultural frontier and overexploitation and inadequate management of natural resources This is despite the fact that the Monarch Butterfly Reserve receives a considerable amount of financial resources from national and international organizations to carry out reforestation programs (Honey-Rosés et al, 2011). Between 2002 and 2010, the region received United States $9.2 million for reforestation programs (SEMARNAT, 2011)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
