Abstract
This paper reviews a 30-month experience with 172 patients suffering abdominal stab wounds treated at the Denver General Hospital, during a period when policy included liberal sinography and all penetrating injuries were explored. Laparotomy was performed in 87%. Of the 65 patients undergoing sinography, 62% indicated peritoneal penetration; of these, 30% had no visceral injury. An additional 10%, with minor intraperitoneal injuries, probably would not have required celiotomy. In 25 cases the stab penetrated the peritoneal cavity after first entering the chest. Peritoneal tap and peritoneal lavage were used in 10 patients. It is concluded that the cost/benefit ratio of sinography is so poor that it is rarely indicated. When doubt exists as to significant intraperitoneal pathology following an abdominal stab wound, close observation without sinography is recommended for determining indication for laparotomy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
