Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show the advantage of introducing the ABC quality cost model in a small company in the field of machining and industrial tooling, how to manage production costs and, as a consequence, control its processes. To achieve the processes and/or products quality, not only the increase of costs needed to maintain the established quality level should be considered. The literature on this subject shows that quality programs, such as Total Quality Control, continuous improvement and other, in fact, decrease production costs, due to the elimination of rework and non-conformity of products delivered to customers, both internal and external. Moreover, any well-structured quality program is a fundamental element of survival, in today very competitive market. In order to develop a quality program, satisfying appropriate financial criteria, appropriate tools of quality cost management should be applied, supported by a continuous data collection system. This activity also requires the establishment of corrective actions, goals and objectives, evaluating the quality performance, in view of the expected results. By means of this case study, developed in a real company, it was possible introduce the costing model ABC to measure its quality costs, identifying and defining its main costs classification. Relevant sources of materials and operational waste generated, corrective and preventive action plans were identified and implemented, reducing by 76 % their quality costs over 12 months. It was concluded that the quality cost management in a small company similar to the one under an analysis, is an advantageous method for decision-taking, appropriate to leverage finance and minimize conformity deviations. After 36 months quality costs decreased further by about 92 %.

Highlights

  • Quality is conceptualized by companies as a main value for the customer, considering this as an essential factor for success, in competitiveness, in face of competition

  • Many companies benchmark with other companies that have created the quality cost program to guide them in identifying quality cost elements (OAKLAND; OAKLAND, 1998)

  • During the twelve months studied, monthly evaluations were performed, comparing with the results collected in the first month, that is, results obtained by the company before the implementation of the chosen methodology and application of the quality cost

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quality is conceptualized by companies as a main value for the customer, considering this as an essential factor for success, in competitiveness, in face of competition. To produce better, with little investment, without harming commercial competitiveness, it is necessary to reduce expenses and costs necessary to achieve quality. To reduce these costs, it is necessary to know, identify, measure and monitor the production chain. Identifying and measuring quality costs are considered an essential activity for managers. The PAF model is the most commonly used in determining quality costs (AOIEONG; TANG; AHMED, 2002; LOVE; IRANI, 2003). The purpose of this model is to emphasize that investments in prevention and evaluation minimize spending on external and internal failures. The purpose of this model is to emphasize that investments in prevention and evaluation minimize spending on external and internal failures. Daniel and Reitsperger (1991) and several other authors (PORTER; RAYNER, 1992; COLE; BACDAYAN; WHITE, 1993) discuss both conflicting views on the economic level of quality cost , illustrated in Figures 1 and 2

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call