Abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI in patients at high bleeding risk: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials

Abstract

Abstract Aims The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) is still debated. We appraised an abbreviated compared with a more prolonged DAPT regimen in this setting by using the totality of existing evidence. Methods and results A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to search randomized clinical trials comparing abbreviated (i.e., short [3 months] or very-short [1 month]) with standard (≥6 months) DAPT in HBR patients. Six trials with 8,409 patients were included. Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (MCRB) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were the co-primary safety and efficacy endpoints. MCRB was lower with abbreviated compared to standard DAPT (risk ratio [RR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.41–0.95; I2=74%). No difference in terms of MACE (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89–1.20; I2=0%) all-cause death, cardiovascular death, stent thrombosis or myocardial infarction were observed. Network meta-analysis showed short or very-short DAPT to have the highest probability to prevent bleeding in HBR patients. Conclusion Abbreviated DAPT reduced bleeding without apparent increase in ischemic events in HBR patients undergoing PCI. Three-month or one-month DAPT courses appeared similarly effective to optimize the trade-off for ischemia and bleeding in this population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.