Abstract
Violence with spiritual weapons, violence with temporal weapons: as contemporaries well knew, the Renaissance popes’ exercise of political power was characterized by a double violence. The overthrow of tyrants and the punishment of rebels were the chief aims of excommunication and interdict. Those weapons were actually first steps towards a declaration of a »just« war. This essay analyses how those arguments were developed, concentrating in particular on the censures of Sixtus IV against Florence (1478) and Venice (1483) and on the excommunications and interdicts levied by Julius II on Bologna (1506) and Venice (1509). In addition, the article expands on the defences that some lawyers constructed against those arguments, positing another truth against the truth of the papal laws. By this means they emphasised their dissent from the papal laws while themselves making use of the law. The »war of writings« caused by Paul V’s interdict against Venice (1606) produced a history of interdicts as a necessary tool for the defence, making explicit the opposition of ius and vis, that is to say, a critique of law’s violence. Recommended citation: De Benedictis, Angela, Abbattere i tiranni, punire i ribelli. Diritto e violenza negli interdetti del Rinascimento, in: Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History Rg 11 (2007) 76-93, online: http://dx.doi.org/10.12946/rg11/076-093
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
