Abstract
Background: The use of biological and synthetic meshes in implant based breast reconstruction (IBBR) has become standard care in recent years, however, there is limited high quality evidence to support their effectiveness or safety profile. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and synthetic meshes, and to evaluate their benefits and risks, including long term comparative data.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
