Abstract

Background:In treating with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), it is needless to say essential treatment goal with first priority. On the other hand, patient’s pain influences on clinical indices deeply, however, pain score is not been regarded as most important despite that correlates with patient reported outcome.Objectives:Clinical significance of remnant pain score for clinical outcome although attaining remission in clinical disease activity index (CDAI) statistically.Methods:RA patient who have attained remission with CDAI were picked up. These patients were divided into two groups whether CDAI at three month after the first CDAI remission attained; namely CDAI-R or CDAI-F. Background data such as sex, age at onset, age, anti-cyclic citrullinated polypeptide antibodies (ACPA), rheumatoid factor (RF), Sharp/van der Heijde Score (SHS), clinical disease activity score (CDAI), C-reactive protein (CRP), modified Health Assessment Questionnaire score (mHAQ), and pain score with visual analog scale (PS-VAS) at first consultation, time span from the first consultation to first CDAI remission were compared between the two groups using Mann-Whitney U-test. CDAI, CRP, mHAQ, PS-VAS, and QOL value calculated from EuroQOL-5 dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) at the time of CDAI were also statistically compared with Mann-Whitney U-test. Parameters that demonstrated statistical significance within 5% were picked up, and odds ratio for CDAI remission were calculated with binary logistic regression analysis. Moreover, parameters that demonstrated statistical significance with p-value within 5% were evaluated with receiver’s observational characteristics (ROC) analysis, and cut-off index (COI) was calculated.Results:A total of 907 patients with 594 CDAI-R and 313 CAI-F were recruied. Demographic characteristics of the two groups were shown in Table 1. SHS at first consultation and time span from first consultation to CDAI remission attained demonstrated significantly less in the CDAI-R than the CDAI-F group, while the other parameters demonstrated no significant difference. CRP, CDAI, mHAQ, PS-VAS, and QOL at CDAI remission demonstrated significant difference between the CDAI-R and CDAI-F groups. With binary logistic regression analysis, CRP, CDAI, and PS-VAS demonstrated significant regression for CDAI-R with 1.68, 0.71, and 0.78 in odds ratio, respectively. COI for CDAI remission was 0.4, 1.0, and 30 for CRP (p=2.4 x 10-4), CDAI (p=3.0 x 10-32), and PS-VAS (p=2.4 x 10-4), respectively.Conclusion:PS-VAS at the moment of CDAI remission is suggested to be predictive factor for sustaining CDAI remission at three months thereafter as well as CRP value and the CDAI score.Table 1.Demographic characteristics of the two groupsCDAI-RCDAI-Fp-valuecases594313sex430 (72.4%)313 (80.2%)5.7 x 10-2age at onset62.260.91.8 x 10-1age at FC65.865.14.7 x 10-1ACPA at FC209.3 (83.9%)227.9 (86.7%)7.2 x 10-2RF at FC83.8 (92.2%)92.3 (86.1%)5.6 x 10-2SHS at FC41.966.96.0 x 19-5CDAI at FC10.711.15.5 x 10-2CRP at FC1.31.61.2 x 10-1mHAQ at FC0.4390.4753.2 x 10-1PS-VAS at FC32.634.92.1 x 10-1time span3.74.56.4 x 10-4Abbreviations: FC, first consultation; ACPA, anti-cyclic citrullinated polypeptide-antibodies; RF, rheumatoid factor; SHS, Sharp/van der eijde Score; CDAI, clinical disease activity index; CRP, C-reacive protein; mHAQ, modified Health Assessment Questionnaire; PS-VAS, pain score with visual analog scale; time span, time span from FC to date first CDAI remission attained.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call