Abstract
The combination of supermolecular Mo/ller–Plesset treatment with the perturbation theory of intermolecular forces is applied in the analysis of the potential energy surface of ArHCl. Two minima have been found, a primary for collinear Ar–HCl and a secondary for collinear Ar–ClH. The depths of these minima are about 12% below the empirical estimates, due to basis set unsaturation of the dispersion contribution. The Ar–HCl structure is favored by the induction and dispersion terms whereas Ar–ClH by the exchange–repulsion term. The total ab initio potential, as well as its components, are compared with related terms of recent Hutson’s H6(3) potential [J. Chem. Phys. 89, 4550 (1988)] and the anisotropy of interaction is analyzed. It is concluded that the one-center multipole expansions of induction and dispersion contributions do not reproduce the correct anisotropy of induction and dispersion terms. Ab initio estimates of three-body effects in the Ar2HCl complex are also discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
