Abstract
AbstractAb‐initio studies were conducted on quantitative aspects of π‐nonbonded, σ–σ*, n–σ*, and throughbond interactions in R1CH2(CH2)N–1 CH2 R2, where R1 and R2 are H and/or nonbonding AO, n, and N = 2, 3, and 4. Geometrical preferences were found to depend both on π‐nonbonding and bond–antibonding interactions, the latter being more important. Level orderings and energy splittings involved in the through‐bond interactions of diradicals can be qualitatively predicted by examining the signs of the overlap between the n orbitals and a common vicinal σ* bond orbital, using simple orbital patterns and paying special attention to the “backside” tails of bond orbitals.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.