Abstract

Ab initio calculations on the ring opening of the cyclopentane and cyclohexane radical cations do not give an explanation of previous experimental findings that, upon electron ionization, the cyclopentane ion ring opens whereas the cyclohexane ion is stable. The main difference between the two cases is that the cyclohexane ion first has to isomerize to the methylcyclopentane structure before ring opening. The barrier heights for ring opening in the two cases are comparable and significantly lower than the difference between the vertical and adiabatic ionization energies. The results suggest that, for an explanation of the experiments, accurate theoretical studies of the ionization process itself will be needed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.