Abstract

The identification of toxic Aβ species and/or the process of their formation is crucial for understanding the mechanism(s) of Aβ neurotoxicity in Alzheimer disease and also for the development of effective diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. To elucidate the structural basis of Aβ toxicity, we developed different procedures to isolate Aβ species of defined size and morphology distribution, and we investigated their toxicity in different cell lines and primary neurons. We observed that crude Aβ42 preparations, containing a monomeric and heterogeneous mixture of Aβ42 oligomers, were more toxic than purified monomeric, protofibrillar fractions, or fibrils. The toxicity of protofibrils was directly linked to their interactions with monomeric Aβ42 and strongly dependent on their ability to convert into amyloid fibrils. Subfractionation of protofibrils diminished their fibrillization and toxicity, whereas reintroduction of monomeric Aβ42 into purified protofibril fractions restored amyloid formation and enhanced their toxicity. Selective removal of monomeric Aβ42 from these preparations, using insulin-degrading enzyme, reversed the toxicity of Aβ42 protofibrils. Together, our findings demonstrate that Aβ42 toxicity is not linked to specific prefibrillar aggregate(s) but rather to the ability of these species to grow and undergo fibril formation, which depends on the presence of monomeric Aβ42. These findings contribute significantly to the understanding of amyloid formation and toxicity in Alzheimer disease, provide novel insight into mechanisms of Aβ protofibril toxicity, and important implications for designing anti-amyloid therapies.

Highlights

  • Aggregation of amyloid-␤ (A␤)2 peptides and deposition into neuritic plaques are hallmark features of Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathology [1, 2]

  • To determine whether the cytotoxicity of protofibrils is associated with specific type of aggregates or depends on the dynamics of inter-conversion among different aggregate species, we subjected a crude A␤42 protofibril preparation (A␤42 crude A␤42 protofibrils (CR)) to fractionation by SEC [12, 24]

  • The identification of toxic A␤ species and/or the process of their formation is crucial for understanding the mechanism(s) of A␤ neurotoxicity in AD and development of effective diagnostic and therapeutic interventions [35]

Read more

Summary

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Chemicals and reagents of analytical grade were purchased from Sigma. Purity distilled water was used to prepare buffers, and solutions were filtered and degassed by passing through vacuum-driven 0.22-␮m stericup filtration units (Millipore, Switzerland) before use. Deoxy-D-glucose (2-[1,2-3H]glucose (2-[3H]DG), specific activity, 30 – 60 Ci/mmol) was obtained from ANAWA (Switzerland). DNase and papain were purchased from Sigma Crude A␤42 protofibril (A␤42 CR) solution was prepared as described previously [24, 27]. 800 ␮l of high purity water was immediately added, and the pH was brought to ϳ7.6 by adding 10 ␮l of 2 M Tris base, pH 7.6. The solution was always freshly prepared and used immediately

Size Exclusion Chromatography
Separation PF
Cell Culture Toxicity Studies
Total volume
Cell Viability Assays
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call