Abstract

Reducing food loss and waste (FLW) is prioritized in UN sustainable development goals (SDG) target 12.3 to contribute to “ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns”. It is expected to significantly improve global food security and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Identifying “hotspots” from different perspectives of sustainability helps to prioritize the food items for which interventions can lead to the largest reduction of FLW-related impacts. Existing studies in this field have limitations, such as having incomplete geographical and food commodity coverage, using outdated data, and focusing on the mass of FLW instead of its nutrient values. To provide renewed and more informative insights, we conducted a global hotspot analysis concerning FLW with its associated GHG emissions and protein losses using the most recent data (the new FAO Food Balance Sheets updated in 2020). The findings of this research are that there were 1.9 Gt of FLW, 2.5 Gt of associated GHG emissions, and 0.1 Gt of associated protein losses globally in 2017. The results of the FLW amounts, GHG emissions, and protein losses per chain link are given on the scale of the entire world and continental regions. Next to this, food items with relatively high FLW, GHG emissions, and protein losses are highlighted to provide the implications to policymakers for better decision making. For example, fruits and vegetables contribute the most to global FLW volumes, but the product with the highest FLW-associated GHG emissions is bovine meat. For bovine meat, FLW-associated GHG emissions are highest at the consumer stage of North America and Oceania. Oil crops are the major source of protein losses in the global food chain. Another important finding with policy implications is that priorities for FLW reduction vary, dependent on prioritized sustainability criteria (e.g., GHG emissions versus protein losses).

Highlights

  • According to World Hunger Statistics, about 1 in 9 people globally do not have enough food to lead a healthy active life

  • For S1 and S2, the corresponding fraction of the primary-production-phase greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions was allocated based on the quantity of food loss and waste (FLW) generated at that stage

  • The corresponding fraction of both primary production and transportation-related GHG emissions were allocated in accordance with the quantity of FLW per stage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to World Hunger Statistics, about 1 in 9 people globally do not have enough food to lead a healthy active life. Following the two FAO studies, Porter, Reay, Higgins and Bomberg [13] made important contributions to this research line by conducting a more comprehensive literature review on FLW percentages and primary-production-phase GHG emission factors along all supply chain stages, across different supranational regions. They used the FAO FBS’s data from 1961 to 2011 to investigate the trend development of FLW and associated GHG emissions. Many raw products can skip the processing stage and directly go to the food distribution stage as fresh produce Another limitation of Porter’s work is that it only presents the GHG emissions from all FLW but not the chain-wise overview. This study enriches the research line of the comprehensive FLW studies, as shown in Figure 1, along the entire food chain at both regional and global levels

Materials and Methods
Results
Protein Losses
Limitations and Future Research
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call