Abstract
Quantification and automation represent important methodological developments in dental microwear analysis and in artifact microwear (use-wear) analysis in order to address the issues of subjectivity and reproducibility of the traditional methods, increase discrimination power, and improve pattern recognition. However, automatic and quantitative methods (dental microwear texture and quantitative artifact microwear analyses) require high-quality data to work with. Surface data acquired with confocal microscopy can reach incredible levels of accuracy and resolution; yet, they are not without issues. In this paper, in an approach similar to quality control in industry, I propose a good-practice workflow for controlling the quality of the acquired and processed 3D data (height maps). I also suggest tools to deal with some of the issues commonly encountered. This workflow should be applied routinely to every height map after acquisition and processing, so that only high-quality height maps are analyzed. In turn, the systematic quality control of the 3D data improves the robustness of the quantitative results and of their interpretations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.