A within-subject comparison of the conventional clasp-retained with attachment-retained removable partial dentures

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study conducted to satisfaction with conventional clasp-retained and attachment-retained removable partial dentures (RPDs) among patients with partially edentulous maxilla. MethodsThe crossover trial recruited 10 patients with bilateral free-end partially edentulous maxilla who received a conventional RPD for 3 months, followed by an attachment-retained removable partial denture (ARRPD) for another 3 months. There was no washout period between the two interventions. During follow-up, patients were requested to complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire. This 9-item validated questionnaire measured patient satisfaction with the ease of cleaning, ability to speak, comfort, aesthetics, stability, ability to masticate different types of food, masticatory efficiency, oral condition, and general satisfaction. ResultsThe comparison of the two treatment modalities showed significantly higher satisfaction with the ARRPD than with the conventional RPD. The ARRPD was preferred due to the ease to clean, speech, comfort, aesthetics, stability, masticatory ability, and masticatory efficiency (p < .05). ConclusionThe study showed higher short-term satisfaction rates in patients with ARRPDs than with the conventional clasp-retained RPDs. The superior aesthetics of ARRPDs are recognized in conjunction with the restoration of the partially edentulous maxilla.