A Welcome to International Authors.

Abstract

Health care delivery has seen a rapid transformation over the past several decades in response to social, cultural, and economic world events. These changes are increasingly driving medical educational reform and research on a global level. Despite the international nature of these changes, the Journal of Graduate Medical Education (JGME) editors are aware of the limited geographic representation and thematic diversity in medical education literature. This underrepresentation is most evident in contributions from low and middle-income countries, whose inhabitants comprise the vast majority of the world's population (in 2021: 85% of 7.8 billion)1 and bear most of the global disease burden.2Similar to biomedical journals, medical education literature is dominated by a few countries and primarily reflects a Western perspective.3 In a review of publications between 1995 and 2000 in 2 leading medical education journals, Tutarel noted that authors from Canada and the United States wrote 95% of all articles in Academic Medicine, and authors from Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States wrote 74% of all articles in Medical Education.4 Doja and colleagues performed a bibliometric analysis of evaluative studies in medical education between 1974 and 2014 and found that the countries with the highest relative publication productivity were Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.5 In a more recent analysis of medical education scholarship published in English and indexed on PubMed, Thomas noted that authors from high-income countries, particularly English-speaking Western countries (United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia), authored 80% of medical education publications.6 In this analysis, geographical diversity of authorship was the lowest in medical education research when compared to several other fields, including biological sciences, medicine, and education.6 These studies highlight that the dominant sources of knowledge generation, synthesis, and dissemination in medical education are highly skewed to select institutions in English-speaking, high-income countries, primarily in North America and Europe.7Some studies suggest that editorial bias (ie, bias that arises from composition of journal editorial boards) contributes to the underrepresentation of authors from low- and middle-income countries. In a 2021 review of editorial board members of 10 medical education journals, 93% were based in high-income countries and 66% were from the 4 countries with the greatest representation of medical education scholarship, namely the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada.8Geographic diversity in medical education publications brings value to readers. Studies have shown that articles published by authors from low- and middle-income countries greatly increase the diversity of questions, theories, and topics in medical education literature.6 With the global mobilization of learners, curricula, and the health care and medical education workforce, curricular reforms and changes in accreditation standards across international borders can have local impact. Further, health education systems worldwide face similar challenges, including workforce shortages, faculty retention concerns, and resource constraints. Novel solutions from non-Western contexts will enrich the global conversation on medical education practices and may be readily transferable. For example, implementing curricula in resource-constrained environments is an area in which international researchers may have more experience. In addition, many international training programs face fewer bureaucratic hurdles, allowing interventions to be implemented and outcomes to be assessed within a relatively shorter period of time.JGME welcomes international authors to submit high-quality studies that explore teaching and learning in graduate medical education from diverse perspectives. We are aware that international authors, particularly those from developing medical education systems, face considerable publication barriers. Lack of resources—including time, funding, experienced mentors, and a perception that education research may be of lower value than clinical research—are some of the challenges.9,10 Also, academic writing, often in what is not the author's first language, can be daunting. Moreover, international authors may not be as aware of current priorities in medical education research, which will push less popular or exhausted topics lower in editorial consideration for publication in an increasingly crowded medical education research environment.11 Based on our experiences as medical education researchers and editors handling international submissions for JGME, we propose tips for the research and writing cycle (Box).In addition to providing resources to help all authors improve the quality of their submissions, we encourage medical education journals to review their processes for promoting geographic representation and diversity in medical education scholarship. JGME has made efforts to include international papers, including the 2019 “A Look Into GME Around the World,” an international supplement with 42 articles highlighting innovations and experiences in graduate medical education from more than 20 countries.25 Since researchers in low-resource settings can face barriers in accessing the current literature, JGME transitioned to open access in 2021 to allow access to all articles at no cost. We also do not charge publication fees, which may present an insurmountable challenge for researchers without funding support. To address issues of publication bias, we have recruited an international reviewer community and advised our associate editors to consider geographical diversity when selecting reviewers. In addition, we have made continued efforts to improve the diversity and inclusivity of our editorial board. Beyond greater geographic coverage, we are also committed to recruiting residents, fellows, and early career educators to the JGME Editorial Board to help mitigate the diversity gap between early career and senior career physicians.Although narrow in scope by focusing on graduate medical education, JGME needs to include more voices and perspectives from more geographical regions of the world. Despite the many challenges, we aim to provide a more diverse and equitable platform for global knowledge dissemination in graduate medical education. We hope to see continued growth in our international submissions and to work within the medical education scholarship community to improve the diversity and inclusivity of medical education research.