Abstract

Vegetation fluctuation is sensitive to climate change, and this response exhibits a time lag. Traditionally, scholars estimated this lag effect by considering the immediate prior lag (e.g., where vegetation in the current month is impacted by the climate in a certain prior month) or the lag accumulation (e.g., where vegetation in the current month is impacted by the last several months). The essence of these two methods is that vegetation growth is impacted by climate conditions in the prior period or several consecutive previous periods, which fails to consider the different impacts coming from each of those prior periods. Therefore, this study proposed a new approach, the weighted time-lag method, in detecting the lag effect of climate conditions coming from different prior periods. Essentially, the new method is a generalized extension of the lag-accumulation method. However, the new method detects how many prior periods need to be considered and, most importantly, the differentiated climate impact on vegetation growth in each of the determined prior periods. We tested the performance of the new method in the Loess Plateau by comparing various lag detection methods by using the linear model between the climate factors and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). The case study confirmed four main findings: (1) the response of vegetation growth exhibits time lag to both precipitation and temperature; (2) there are apparent differences in the time lag effect detected by various methods, but the weighted time-lag method produced the highest determination coefficient (R2) in the linear model and provided the most specific lag pattern over the determined prior periods; (3) the vegetation growth is most sensitive to climate factors in the current month and the last month in the Loess Plateau but reflects a varied of responses to other prior months; and (4) the impact of temperature on vegetation growth is higher than that of precipitation. The new method provides a much more precise detection of the lag effect of climate change on vegetation growth and makes a smart decision about soil conservation and ecological restoration after severe climate events, such as long-lasting drought or flooding.

Highlights

  • The number of significant pixels in which temperature had the smallest influence on normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in July and August were less than 35% (P < 0.05), and the largest in April and May, reaching more than 45%

  • We summarized the different types of methods to detect the time lag; we proposed a new weighted method by considering the continuity, shift, and accumulation of the climate impact on vegetation

  • We further compared our method with others within a case study, where we used them in a study to detect the response of vegetation to the climate in Loess Plateau from 1982–2013

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The lag method assumes that the climate factors impact the vegetation in the time (month, year, season, or other scales) of interest in a particular previous month (year, season, or other scales) With such a method, Wu et al [30] delivered the spatial pattern of the lag response of vegetation to global precipitation, temperature, and sunlight duration. Considering that the impact of climate on vegetation exhibits, consecutively, diversity and accumulation [28,32,33,34,35], we propose a weighted time-lag method to address the question In this method, we consider the ecosystem to have a lag response to climate factors in previous periods, and precipitation and temperature in the previous months affect the vegetation growth in the current month at different weights. 21, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW verify the method is running as it is supposed to be, and we can validate the results by studies addressing such a vulnerable ecosystem in the semi-arid area

Study Area
Datasets
Proposed Method
Previous Lag Methods
Then mean values of months as follows
Proposed Weighted Time-Lag Method
Regression Strategy
Results
Comparison of the Different Lag Method in Linear Regression
The correlation andformulated temperature formulated by different
Method
Results of Linear Regression
Methods method method
Figures areas
Lag Methods
Impact of Precipitation and Temperature on Vegetation in Loess Plateau
Lag Effects of Climate Factors on Vegetation on the Loess Plateau
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.