Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), limited access to a range of supports means that families often carry primary responsibility for the care of a disabled child. The impact of this responsibility is poorly understood. Objective: To present a selective review, critique, and comparison of the prominent areas of research aimed at understanding families with disabled children in the Global South. Design: We compare and critically discuss prominent bodies of literature concerning the family-disability-poverty nexus in LMICs. Results: Three prominent bodies of literature concerned with families with a disabled child in LMICs are reviewed. These were selected based on their relative prevalence in a large review of the literature, and comprise (1) work concerning quality of life (FQOL) of families with a disabled child; (2) interventions aimed at supporting families with a disabled child in LMICs; and (3) the ways in which culture mediates the families’ experience of disability. FQOL research points to poverty as a primary source of family distress, and directs our focus towards families’ own expertise in coping with their circumstances. Intervention literature from LMICs highlights the family as the unit of analysis and praxis concerning disabled children, and reminds us of the contextual factors which must be considered when working with their families. Conclusions: Culturally oriented research on poverty, disability, and the family nuances our understanding of the locally-determined priorities of families with a disabled child in LMICs. All three research strands carry benefits, limitations and gaps. The complexity of understanding families with a disabled child in LMICs comes to the fore, directing us away from narrow application of any single theoretical or research framework. Future researchers may draw on insights provided here in creating a more integrated approach.

Highlights

  • In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), limitedor non-access to a range of social supports means that families often carry primary responsibility for the care of disabled children

  • Several research strands have investigated the circumstances of families with a disabled child, within a variety of domains (Note: the manner in which we use the term families here incorporates a range of ways of being in which people who are related by marriage or blood find themselves arranged)

  • This paper, presents a selective review, critique, and comparison of the prominent areas of research aimed at understanding families with disabled children in the Global South

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), limited access to a range of supports means that families often carry primary responsibility for the care of a disabled child. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), limitedor non-access to a range of social supports means that families often carry primary responsibility for the care of disabled children The impact of this responsibility, in contexts of poverty, is complex and poorly understood. Several research strands have investigated the circumstances of families with a disabled child, within a variety of domains (Note: the manner in which we use the term families here incorporates a range of ways of being in which people who are related by marriage or blood find themselves arranged) Each of these strands of work elides certain realities of such families in the Global South (LMICs), despite making some useful contributions. An examination of the literature in support of the project uncovered the overall paucity and limited applicability of existing research in the area relevant to LMIC contexts

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.