Abstract

We consider testing for weak instruments in a model with multiple endogenous variables. Unlike Stock and Yogo (2005), who considered a weak instruments problem where the rank of the matrix of reduced form parameters is near zero, here we consider a weak instruments problem of a near rank reduction of one in the matrix of reduced form parameters. For example, in a two-variable model, we consider weak instrument asymptotics of the form π1=δπ2+c/n where π1 and π2 are the parameters in the two reduced-form equations, c is a vector of constants and n is the sample size. We investigate the use of a conditional first-stage F-statistic along the lines of the proposal by Angrist and Pischke (2009) and show that, unless δ=0, the variance in the denominator of their F-statistic needs to be adjusted in order to get a correct asymptotic distribution when testing the hypothesis H0:π1=δπ2. We show that a corrected conditional F-statistic is equivalent to the Cragg and Donald (1993) minimum eigenvalue rank test statistic, and is informative about the maximum total relative bias of the 2SLS estimator and the Wald tests size distortions. When δ=0 in the two-variable model, or when there are more than two endogenous variables, further information over and above the Cragg–Donald statistic can be obtained about the nature of the weak instrument problem by computing the conditional first-stage F-statistics.

Highlights

  • Following the work of Staiger and Stock (1997) and Stock and Yogo (2005), testing for weak instruments is commonplace

  • Using our weak instrument asymptotics we show that this conditional F -statistic cannot be used in the same way as the Stock and Yogo (2005) procedure for a single endogenous variable to assess the magnitude of the relative bias of the 2SLS estimator of an individual structural parameter

  • We have shown that a conditional first-stage F -test statistic can be informative about the information that instruments provide for models with multiple endogenous variables

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Following the work of Staiger and Stock (1997) and Stock and Yogo (2005), testing for weak instruments is commonplace. Using our weak instrument asymptotics we show that this conditional F -statistic cannot be used in the same way as the Stock and Yogo (2005) procedure for a single endogenous variable to assess the magnitude of the relative bias of the 2SLS estimator of an individual structural parameter. In a two-endogenous-variable model the conditional F -statistics for each reduced form are equivalent to each other and to the Cragg–Donald minimum eigenvalue statistic under our LRR1 weak instrument asymptotics This holds unless δ = 0, in which case the local rank reduction is due to the fact that π1 is local to zero and the first-stage F -statistic for x1 will be small and that for x2 will be large.

Weak instrument asymptotics in one-variable model
4.98. When kz
Two variable model
Conditional F -test
Relationship with Cragg–Donald statistic
Local to rank one weak instrument asymptotics in the twovariable model
Monte Carlo illustration
More than two endogenous variables
Conclusions
Total relative bias
Findings
Stata code
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call