Abstract

Summary Polymer flooding improves the sweep efficiency of viscous oil recovery over waterflooding. The low-tension polymer (LTP) flooding has the potential to improve the displacement efficiency due to low interfacial tension (IFT) without sacrificing sweep efficiency. Compared with ultralow tension (<0.001 mN/m) alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) floods, LTP flooding uses a low concentration surfactant to moderately reduce the IFT (>0.01 mN/m). The objective of this research is to evaluate the performance of LTP floods as a function of IFT for a viscous oil in a 2D sandpack. Over 20 nonionic surfactants/cosolvents were tested. A series of sandpack flooding experiments were conducted in a custom-designed 2D visualization cell. The results show that short-hydrophobic surfactants 2EH-xPO-yEO can reduce the IFT to as low as 0.05 dyne/cm. Flooding experiments were performed in sandpacks with and without connate water saturation. The sandpack was water-wet for the experiments with connate water. For the experiments without connate water, the sandpack was oil-wet. A base-case secondary polymer flood (without any surfactant) with a viscosity ratio (µo/µp) of 10 showed a stable displacement and an oil recovery of 82% at the first pore volume injected (PVI). An LTP flood with an IFT of 0.1 dyne/cm also had a stable displacement front, but a higher oil recovery at 1 PVI [90% original oil in place (OOIP)]. Further reduction in IFT to 0.05 dyne/cm resulted in an unstable displacement and a lower recovery of 65% OOIP. For the experiments without connate water saturation, sandpack was oil-wet; the base-case polymer flood at a viscosity ratio of 10 showed severe fingering and a low oil recovery at 1 PVI (58% OOIP). Adding surfactants did not improve the oil recovery in oil-wet sandpacks.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call