Abstract
We study the asymptotic behavior, when \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\), of the minimizers \(\{u_\varepsilon \}_{\varepsilon >0}\) for the energy $$\begin{aligned} E_\varepsilon (u)=\int _{\Omega }\Big (|\nabla u|^2+\big (\frac{1}{\varepsilon ^2}-1\big )|\nabla |u||^2\Big ), \end{aligned}$$over the class of maps \(u\in H^1(\Omega ,{{\mathbb {R}}}^2)\) satisfying the boundary condition \(u=g\) on \(\partial \Omega \), where \(\Omega \) is a smooth, bounded and simply connected domain in \({{\mathbb {R}}}^2\) and \(g:\partial \Omega \rightarrow S^1\) is a smooth boundary data of degree \(D\ge 1\). The motivation comes from a simplified version of the Ericksen model for nematic liquid crystals with variable degree of orientation. We prove convergence (up to a subsequence) of \(\{u_\varepsilon \}\) towards a singular \(S^1\)–valued harmonic map \(u_*\), a result that resembles the one obtained in Bethuel et al. (Ginzburg–Landau Vortices, Birkhäuser, 1994) for an analogous problem for the Ginzburg–Landau energy. There are however two striking differences between our result and the one involving the Ginzburg–Landau energy. First, in our problem, the singular limit \(u_*\) may have singularities of, degree strictly larger than one. Second, we find that the principle of “equipartition” holds for the energy of the minimizers, i.e., the contributions of the two terms in \(E_\varepsilon (u_\varepsilon )\) are essentially equal.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.