A Variational Method for Analyzing Vortex Flows in Radar-Scanned Tornadic Mesocyclones. Part IV: Applications to the 20 May 2013 Oklahoma Tornadic Mesocyclone

Abstract

Abstract The variational method for vortex flow (VF) analyses, called VF-Var (formulated in Part I), is applied to the 20 May 2013 Newcastle–Moore tornadic mesocyclone observed from the operational KTLX radar and an experimental phased-array radar. The dual-Doppler-analyzed VF field reveals the following features: The axisymmetric part of the VF is a well-defined slantwise two-cell vortex in which the maximum tangential velocity is nearly 40 m s−1 at the edge of the vortex core (0.6 km from the vortex center), the central downdraft velocity reaches −35 m s−1 at 3-km height, and the surrounding-updraft velocity reaches 26 m s−1 at 5-km height. The total VF field is a loosely defined slantwise two-cell vortex consisting of a nearly axisymmetric vortex core (in which the ground-relative surface wind speed reaches 50 m s−1 on the southeast edge), a strong nonaxisymmetric slantwise downdraft in the vortex core, and a main updraft in a banana-shaped area southeast of the vortex core, which extends slantwise upward and spirals cyclonically around the vortex core. The single-Doppler analysis with observations from the KTLX radar only exhibits roughly the same features as the dual-Doppler analysis but contains spurious vertical-motion structures in and around the vortex core. Analysis errors are assessed by leveraging the findings from Parts II and III, which indicate that the dual-Doppler-analyzed VF is accurate enough to represent the true VF but the single-Doppler-analyzed VF is not (especially for nonaxisymmetric vertical motions in and around the vortex core), so the dual-Doppler-analyzed VF should be useful for initializing/verifying high-resolution tornado simulations. Significance Statement After the variational method for vortex flow (VF) analyses, called VF-Var (formulated in Part I of this paper series), was tested successfully with simulated radar observations in Part II and its sensitivity to vortex center location error was examined in Part III, the method is now applied to the 20 May 2013 Newcastle–Moore tornadic mesocyclone observed from the operational KTLX radar and an experimental phased-array radar. Analysis errors are assessed by leveraging the findings from Parts II and III. The results indicate that the dual-Doppler-analyzed VF is accurate enough to represent the true VF (although the single-Doppler-analyzed VF is not especially for nonaxisymmetric vertical motions in and around the vortex core) and thus should be useful for initializing/verifying high-resolution tornado simulations.