Abstract

This study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of a novel plastic optical fiber (POF) sensor, which was developed to measure the angles of flexion, extension and lateral bend at the lumbar region. The angles of flexion, extension and lateral bend for a standing position were measured simultaneously using both the novel POF sensor of this investigation and the commercial Biometrics goniometer instrument. Each movement had two steps of bending which were 10° and 20° based on inclinometer readings. The POF sensor had good intra-rater reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.61 to 0.83). Bland–Altman plots were used to study the agreement using these two sensors. There were proportional differences and bias between the POF sensor and Biometrics goniometer, as the zero points did not lie in the percentage difference region in the Bland–Altman plots. The proportional difference between these two likely reflects the different sizes and thus, measurement regions of the two sensors. There was also strong correlation between the two sensors (r > 0.77). Hence, the POF sensor could be of potential utility in measuring lumbar range of motion (ROM) in a manner which is minimally invasive, and where discrete sections of the spine are under specific investigation.

Highlights

  • Low back pain (LBP) is a very common health problem and a leading cause of disability worldwide [1]

  • This study investigated the validity of the novel plastic optical fiber (POF) sensor by comparing the measurements of flexion, extension and lateral bend in both directions with a commercial Biometrics goniometer instrument

  • The Biometrics goniometer was used to measure the flexion angle of the whole lumbar spine which is indicated from L1 to L5

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Low back pain (LBP) is a very common health problem and a leading cause of disability worldwide [1]. LBP can develop in any person of any age. There are a range of factors associated with LBP which include increasing age, lack of exercise, obesity, smoking, depression and workplace factors [2,3,4,5]. Low back movement can be analyzed using surface markers in laboratories which is the most common method [6]. It does not provide a highly accurate measurement compared to radiographic imaging [7]. Radiographic imaging includes radiography scanning modalities, e.g., X-rays [8] and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [9], as well as computer assisted tomography

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call