Abstract

Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC), famously defined as “the ability to interact with people from another country and culture in a foreign language” (Byram 1997: 71) has now become a generally accepted fact in teaching ESP and BE (Hofstede 1991). The growing popularity of ICC models, such as Byram’s, at the same time, attracted a number of critics who accuse these models of perpetuating the ideas and ideologies connected with essentialism and the so-called national culture (Matsuo 2012), Cartesian rationalisation, as well as a more general lack of attention to the social and thus necessarily dynamic nature of language (Ferri 2014; Hoff 2014; Matsuo 2015). In an attempt to reconcile a theory with its practice, the paper seeks to find a middle ground between the practitioners, who tend to see ICC and its models through a more pragmatic lens, i.e., as a useful pedagogic tool, and its critics, who seem to be waiting for their chance to discard it as a collection of clichés.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.