Abstract

„…€&‚† | Poucos conceitos em urbanismo aspiram tocar a condicao urbana e a FYQFSJEODJBEBDJEBEFDPNPPEFiVSCBOJEBEFumFUBMWF[OFOIVNPVUSPUFOIBFODPOUSBEPVNBEFOJEEPUEPQPVDPTJTUFNAUJDBGBTUBOEPTFEBTEFOJE×FTVTVBJTEBTDPOEJE×FTFTQBDJBJTEBVSCBOJEBEFPQSFTFOUFUSBCBMIPQSPQ×FVNBBCPSEBHFNBMUFSOBUJWBBPUFNBBQBSUJSEBBQSPYJNBEEPFOUSFEVBTASFBTBJOEBFTUSBOIBTFOUSFTJFTUVEPTVSCBOPTFBMPTPB#VTDBOEPSFDPOIFDFSPTEJGFSFOUFTNPEPTEBFYQFSJEODJBVSCBOBFBTEJNFOT×FTGFOPNFOPMOHJDBDPNVOJDBUJWBFPOUPMOHJDBEBVSCBOJEBEFDPNPVNBUSBNBEFSFMBE×FTFOUSFBUPSFTBUPTFFTQBEPTPBSUJHPEJTDVUFBTDPOEJE×FTEBEJWFSTJEBEFBTUFOT×FTEFEFTJOUFHSBEEPTPDJBMFBTQSPQSJFEBEFTNBUFSJBJTRVFBTTFHVSBSJBNVNQBQFMQPUFODJBMNFOUFJOUFHSBEPSAEVSCF'JOBMNFOUFQSPQ×FPSFDPOIFDJNFOUPEFEJGFSFOUFTVSCBOJEBEFTQBVUBEBTQPSVNFUIPTDPNPSFRVJTJUPBDPFYJTUEODJBEBTGPSNBTEFWJEBe o bem-vir de alteridades como o devir do urbano numa urbanidade plena e aberta. 1BMBWSBTDIBWFVSCBOJEBEFEFWJSFYQFSJEODJBVSCBOBƒ$%$'„$€ ()$'… | cultura urbana, espaco publico, urbanidade.$*€#„$(# | Few notions aspire to reach the condition of urban life and experience as that of “urbanity” – and perhaps no one has done so more imprecisely. Departing •om usual focus on the spatial conditions of urbanity, the paper brings a potentially •esher approach which draws •om disciplines still largely unrelated: philosophy and urban studies. A series of concepts of urbanity unfold as we explore the experiential, communicative and ontological conditions of urbanity as a lively fabric of relations of actors, acts and spaces. €e approach shows the fabric of urbanity cut across by an ethos inherent to forms of life open to an unbounded communication, and aims at a de†nition which would allow us to get reconnected with the common sense notion: urbanity as the ethos of an open coexistence, the orientation to the Other and the becoming of the urban.+…, -†„!€ | urban cultura, public space, urbanity.

Highlights

  • | Poucos conceitos em urbanismo aspiram tocar a condição urbana e a FYQFSJËODJBEBDJEBEFDPNPPEFiVSCBOJEBEFumFUBMWF[OFOIVNPVUSPUFOIBFODPOUSBEP VNBEFđOJÉÈPUÈPQPVDPTJTUFNÃUJDB"GBTUBOEPTFEBTEFđOJÉ×FTVTVBJTEBTDPOEJÉ×FT FTQBDJBJT EB VSCBOJEBEF P QSFTFOUF USBCBMIP QSPQ×F VNB BCPSEBHFN BMUFSOBUJWB BP UFNBBQBSUJSEBBQSPYJNBÉÈPFOUSFEVBTÃSFBTBJOEBFTUSBOIBTFOUSFTJFTUVEPTVSCBOPT F B đMPTPđB #VTDBOEP SFDPOIFDFS PT EJGFSFOUFT NPEPT EB FYQFSJËODJB VSCBOB F BT EJNFOT×FTGFOPNFOPMÓHJDB DPNVOJDBUJWBFPOUPMÓHJDBEBVSCBOJEBEFDPNPVNBUSBNB EFSFMBÉ×FTFOUSFBUPSFT BUPTFFTQBÉPT PBSUJHPEJTDVUFBTDPOEJÉ×FTEBEJWFSTJEBEF BT UFOT×FTEFEFTJOUFHSBÉÈPTPDJBMFBTQSPQSJFEBEFTNBUFSJBJTRVFBTTFHVSBSJBNVNQBQFM QPUFODJBMNFOUFJOUFHSBEPSÆVSCF'JOBMNFOUF QSPQ×FPSFDPOIFDJNFOUPEFEJGFSFOUFT VSCBOJEBEFTQBVUBEBTQPSVNFUIPTDPNPSFRVJTJUPBDPFYJTUËODJBEBTGPSNBTEFWJEB e o bem-vir de alteridades como o devir do urbano numa urbanidade plena e aberta. 1BMBWSBTDIBWFVSCBOJEBEF EFWJS FYQFSJËODJBVSCBOB

  • | Few notions aspire to reach the condition of urban life and experience as that of “urbanity” – and perhaps no one has done so more imprecisely

  • A series of concepts of urbanity unfold as we explore the experiential, communicative and ontological conditions of urbanity as a lively fabric of relations of actors, acts and spaces

Read more

Summary

Tensões de desintegração na reprodução dos campos sociais

- formação de identidades por diferenciação e similaridade social FNFSHËODJBEFDBNQPTTPDJBJTEJTUJOUPT DPNNBJPSJOUFSBUJWJEBEFJOUFSOB "SFEVÉÈPTVCTUBODJBMEBJOUFSBÉÈPEPTTPDJBMNFOUFEJGFSFOUFTmTPCSFUVEPTFOÈP DPNQFOTBEBT QPS EJOÄNJDBT EF JOUFSBÉÈP EF DBNQPT TPDJBJT m QPEF JNQMJDBS FN restrição de interações0SB TBCFNPTRVFBSFTUSJÉÈPEFJOUFSBÉ×FTÊBQSÓQSJBEFđOJÉÈPmBNBJTTPđTUJDBEBFTJNQMFTmEFुsegregação EFđOJÉÈPEF'SFFNBO. Se a copresença, o reconhecimento mútuo e a interação dos diferentes são os meios de travessia entre campos sociais, como o espaço urbano poderia efetiválos? A cidade como meio da interação dos diferentes Uma forma capaz de sintetizar essas leituras e de reconhecer o espaço da cidade como meio na trama da comunicação pode ser construída via um conceito renovaEPEFTJHOJđDBEP BQBSUJSEF)VTTFSMF-VINBOOPTJHOJđDBEPDPNPSFGFSËODJB19 " DPOTUSVÉÈP EP TJHOJđDBEP FN QSÃUJDBT BSUFGBUPT F FTQBÉPT TÓ HBOIB TFOUJEP BP FWPDBSUSBNBTEFSFGFSËODJBTBTJHOJđDBEPTFNPVUSBTQSÃUJDBT BSUFGBUPTFFTQBÉPT 4ÓFOUFOEFNPTPTJHOJđDBEPEFBMHPBPSFMBDJPOÃMPBUBOUBTPVUSBTDPJTBT&TTBQSPQSJFEBEFEPTJHOJđDBEP DPNPSFGFSËODJB HBSBOUFBDPOFYÈPFOUSFBUPTJHOJđDBUJWP DPNP OPTTPT HFTUPT F B GBMB. A cidade representa, assim, a possibilidade da comunicação como modo de asTPDJBÉÈPFDPNQSFTTÈPFTQBÉPUFNQPSBMEBTJOUFSBÉ×FT0FTQBÉPVSCBOPÊPUFDJEP EBDPOFDUJWJEBEFEPTOPTTPTBUPT VNNFJPEBFTUSVUVSBÉÈPEBQSÃUJDBF QPSUBOUP EPQSÓQSJPNVOEPTPDJBM WFKB/FUUP

4JNPOTFO ăSJĕ
Dimensão Ontológica
Comunicação livre de coerção no espaço urbano
Diferentes urbanidades
Responsabilidade nos Atos de urbanização
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call