Abstract

The snap-off is an instability phenomenon that takes place during the immiscible two-phase flow in porous media due to competing forces acting on the fluid phases and at the interface between them. Different theoretical approaches have been proposed for the development of mathematical models that describe the dynamics of a fluid/fluid interface in order to analyze the snap-off mechanism. The models studied here are based on the “small-slope” approach and were derived from the mass conservation and other governing equations of two-phase flow at pore scale in circular capillaries for pure and complex interfaces. The models consist of evolution equations; highly nonlinear partial differential equations of fourth order in space and first order in time. Although the structure of the models for each type of interface is similar, different numerical techniques have been employed to solve them. Here, we propose a unifying numerical framework to solve the group of such models. Such a framework is based on the Fourier pseudo-spectral differentiation method which uses the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and the inverse FFT (IFFT) algorithms. We compared the solutions obtained with this method to the results reported in the literature in order to validate our framework. In general, acceptable agreements were obtained in the dynamics of the snap-off.

Highlights

  • When a fluid displaces another in a porous media, different displacement mechanisms may occur depending on the local flow conditions

  • It is from this general review, that we can appreciate that there is great diversity in the schemes traditionally used to solve the models of the different interfaces reported

  • The models presented in Sections 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 consist in highly non-linear partial differential equations, fourth order in space and first order in time, whose analytical solution can be very complex if no simplifications are made

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When a fluid displaces another in a porous media, different displacement mechanisms may occur depending on the local flow conditions. Note that the computing time in the case of BD model is in the order of minutes, while CFD experiments took at least 1 day per scenario It is from this general review, that we can appreciate that there is great diversity in the schemes traditionally used to solve the models of the different interfaces reported (gas–liquid elastic, gas–liquid and liquid–liquid). This situation may be considered as restrictive when it is necessary to assess the effects of different fluids in a two-phase flow system under instability conditions.

Geometry of the Problem
Drop and Bubble Snap-Off Models
General Considerations for the Derivation of Models
Inviscid Core Fluid Models
Initial and Boundary Conditions
Initial Conditions
Boundary Conditions
Numerical Procedures
Results and Discussion
FPSFigure methods for
4.4.Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call