Abstract

AbstractThe transformation kinetics during phase transitions in solids are often described by a pair of scalar variables for both the thermodynamic force and flux. Based on the use of the Eshelby‐Tensor as the thermodynamic driving force for the phase‐transition, a tensorial measure is introduced which is used as the associated thermodynamic flux. Based on the assumption that the process maximizes the dissipation, these measures are used to describe the transformation kinetics during the phase transition. The tensorial description reduces to a description with the Gibbs‐energy as the driving force and the mass change of the phases as the thermodynamic flux for a hydrostatic stress state.These considerations serve as the base for a phenomenological material‐law which describes the austenite‐martensite transformation in steels. In order to incorporate the different behavior of the phases, they are modeled independently. The model have been implemented into a finite‐element‐code which allows thermodynamically coupled calculations. A quenching‐test of a cylindrical specimen under biaxial mechanical load is simulated. The influence of the sequence of the change of the thermomechanical load in the stress‐temperature space (temperature→stress vs. temperature→stress) is studied. Furthermore, the influence of the direction of the applied stress is presented.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.