A unified heart rate control approach for cycle ergometer and treadmill exercise

Abstract

ObjectiveTo develop a unified heart rate (HR) control approach for cycle ergometer (CE) and treadmill (TM) exercise, and to empirically compare the common controller's performance between the CE and TM. MethodsThe control method used frequency-domain shaping of the input-sensitivity function to address rejection of disturbances arising from broad-spectrum heart rate variability (HRV). A single controller was calculated using an approximate, nominal linear plant model and an input-sensitivity bandwidth specification. Fifty HR control tests were executed using the single controller: 25 healthy male participants each did one test on the CE and one on the TM. ResultsThere was no significant difference in mean root-mean-square HR tracking error: 3.10 bpm ± 0.68 bpm and 2.85 bpm ± 0.75 bpm (mean ± standard deviation, bpm = beats/min); CE vs. TM; p = 0.13. But mean normalised average control signal power was significantly different: 1.59 bpm2 ± 0.27 bpm2 vs. 1.36 bpm2 ± 0.28 bpm2; CE vs. TM; p = 3.5 × 10−4. Conclusion and significanceThe lower values for RMS tracking error and control signal power for the TM point to decreasing HRV intensity with increasing HR, because, in order to match perceived exertion for the two modalities, mean HR for the TM was set 20 bpm higher than for the CE. These HR-intensity-dependent differences in HRV are consistent with previous observations in the literature. The unified HR control approach for CE and TM exercise gave accurate, stable and robust performance in all tests, thus lending support to the concept that HRV disturbance rejection is the main issue in HR control design.