Abstract
This paper focuses on contrast research of four latent variable multivariate regression (LVMR) methods, i.e., principal component regression (PCR), partial least square regression (PLSR), canonical correlation regression (CCR) and reduced rank regression (RRR). The performances are evaluated by mean square error (MSE). A unified framework, called weight-framework, is proposed, where each LVMR method as well as the ordinary least square regression (OLSR) can be represented by a specific Weight matrix. Moreover, three theorems are proved delicately. The first one is coefficient theorem which reveals the relations between the coefficients estimated by the four LVMR methods and OLSR; the second one is MSE theorem which contrasts the calibration performances of the different methods; the third one is fault detection rate (FDR) theorem, which tells the different FDR when LVMR is applied for fault detection. Finally, two simulated data sets and one real data set collected from a benchmark system validate the correctness of our theoretical results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.