A Unified Framework for Comparing the Classification Performance Between Quad-, Compact-, and Dual-Polarimetric SARs

Abstract

Polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been extensively used in various remote sensing applications. In this article, a unified framework is designed to compare the classification performance of different polarimetric systems, which include quad-polarimetric (QP), compact-polarimetric (CP), and dual-polarimetric (DP). To avoid problems, such as the lack of uniform standards in feature extraction, the classification algorithm is directly based on the statistical characteristics of the coherency/covariance matrix and is implemented by extending the Wishart mixture model (WMM). The GF-3 data set in San Francisco and the AIRSAR agricultural data set in Flevoland are used in the experiment, and the following conclusions are generated. QP can achieve the highest classification accuracy in all classification tasks. When distinguishing three typical classes (water, urban, and vegetation) with very different scattering characteristics, the performance of different polarimetric systems is similar, and QP has only a slight advantage. For classification tasks of different classes with similar scattering characteristics, CP performs better in agricultural scenes, and the overall accuracy (OA) is only reduced by 3%–4% compared with QP. DP performs better in urban scenes, and OA is only reduced by 1%–3% compared with QP. These conclusions can provide guidance for future payloads’ design and the choice of polarimetric operation mode for existing multi-polarimetric SAR systems to achieve the purpose of giving full play to the advantages of different polarimetric systems.