Abstract

Compared with B-mode imaging, three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging is more helpful in research and clinical application. At present, the 3D ultrasound images can be acquired directly with two-dimensional (2D) array transducer or reconstructed from a series of B-mode images obtained with one-dimensional (1D) array transducer. Imaging with 2D array transducer can achieve a high frame rate, but suffering from the complexity of the imaging system, such as the large amount of channels, and high computational complexity. Reconstructing 3D images from a series of B-mode images can be implemented by recording the position and orientation of the slice images. This is a low-cost and flexible imaging method, but usually suffering from the low imaging quality and low frame rate. In our previous work, a novel 3D ultrasound imaging method in frequency domain with a moved 1D array transducer is presented. This method can reduce the computational complexity with FFT, and get improved imaging quality and frame rate to some extent. Besides, this method can be adopted to construct images with a row–column-addressed 2D array, which can reduce the amount of channels effectively. In this paper, a two-steps implementation of this imaging method is proposed, in which the combined implementation of the 3D imaging is decomposed to two steps of 2D imaging processes in Frequency domain. In the first step, the received echoes of the 1D array transducer at each position are processed with a 2D imaging processes in the lateral- axial planes. In the second step, a 2D imaging processes is preformed in the planes of orthogonal to the transducer. Simulation results show that the two-steps implementation can achieve almost the same imaging quality to the previous work. Compared with the implementation of 3D imaging in our previous work, the proposed two-steps implementation can be carried out with parallel process to improve the computational efficiency, or carried out with loop to reduce the hardware cost. Besides, the first step can be performed with a conventional DAS imaging method when a cylindrical wave is adopted for imaging. The influence of the spread angle of the field is also discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call