A two-phase open-field test to evaluate the host-specificity of candidate biological control agents for Heliotropium amplexicaule

Abstract

Abstract This paper describes an open-field host-specificity test conducted to make a preliminary evaluation of the safety of four candidate agents for the biological control of Heliotropium amplexicaule , an invasive weed of South American origin. These agents were a leaf-eating beetle, Deuterocampta quadrijuga , a flea-beetle, Longitarsus sp., that feeds on leaves as an adult and roots as a larva, a shoot-feeding thrips, Haplothrips heliotropica , and a cell-sucking bug, Dictyla sp. During the first phase of the experiment, the four agents were given a choice between the target weed and six species of nontarget plant of varying degrees of phylogenetic relatedness. All four species were found to feed and reproduce on only H. amplexicaule and the closely related H. nicotianaefolium (a member of the same section of the genus Heliotropium ). No plants outside this genus were attacked. For the second “no-choice” phase, the host-plants used in Phase 1 were cut, forcing the insects to use either other plant species within the plots, emigrate, or die of starvation. Heliothrips heliotropica disappeared rapidly from the plot, while D. quadrijuga persisted for several days on Heliotropium arborescens with some exploratory nibbling and then disappeared. Host-choice behavior of these species therefore remained unchanged, even in the absence of the primary host-plants. In contrast, adults of Longitarsus sp. rapidly colonized and fed on H. arborescens when the preferred hosts were removed. It therefore demonstrated a wider host-range under these more extreme conditions. In fact, on some plots, feeding commenced on H. arborescens before the “no-choice” phase, once the two preferred Heliotropium species were heavily damaged by these insects. The two-phase test is shown here to be a useful way of measuring host-choice behavior under “normal” conditions of choice and under more extreme conditions, such as it might occur were an agent to locally destroy the target weed following its release. It therefore provides a more refined assessment of the risk that would be posed to nontarget plants by the release of weed biological control agents.