Abstract

The present perspective is a synthesis of 108 published investigations in the setting of different types of left ventricular rupture following mitral valve replacement (MVR). We identified 109 investigations and reviewed the clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, surgical techniques and outcomes. Clinical presentation, roentgenography, cross-sectional transthoracic/transesophageal echocardiography and computerized tomography provided the diagnostic information and defined the causative mechanism. Magnetic resonance imaging had been used for further clarification of the native ventricular anatomy in high-risk subset of patients, undergoing non-traditional transapical off-pump mitral valve repair with neochordal implantation. In this article, we have attempted to address several concerning issues and controversies with reference to the possible causative mechanisms, preventive measures, the issue of chordal preservation during MVR, the degree of decalcification required in cases of heavily calcified mitral annulus, selection of appropriate sized prosthetic valves, the surgical importance of a small left ventricle, various techniques of repair, role of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest during the repair of left ventricular rupture, the role of biodegradable epicardial tissue sealants, to repair or not to repair the atrio-ventricular groove hematoma during mitral valve surgery, and the role of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in the perioperative period. Additionally, we have highlighted a new type of left ventricular rupture described in the literature located between the base of the papillary muscle and the apex, which can be categorized as a complication of new technologies of mitral valve repair such as NeoChord device artificial chordal implantation. We have classified this category as type IV ventricular rupture. Overall, this review attempts to address the guidelines for different surgical approaches and techniques of repair of different types of left ventricular rupture for a successful outcome. We submit that an increased appreciation of the causative mechanisms of different types of left ventricular rupture and its prevention may well contribute to improved surgical management.

Highlights

  • SC63 years; range valvotomy (n=4); 10 of (n=1); Xenomedia porcine (n=1); 50-74 years 710 patients (1.4%) intermittent cross-clamp, electrical undergoing mitral valve replacement (MVR) had left fibrillation (n=4); cold potassium ventricular rupture cardioplegia (n=6); type I rupturewhile coming off cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-bleeding; attempted repair- 7 females; deep mattress sutures on 2 Ticron polytetra fluoroethylene (Teflon) strips, 1 around the base of posterior mitral leaftlet, other in the area of papillary muscle

  • 61 years RHD, mitral stenosis, Cardiopulmonary bypass; MVR- Died of bleeding et al21 female chronic atrial fibrillation medium sized Beall valve; off CPB; type I rupture; attempted repair from inside

  • Suture between valve ring passed through the ventricular wall; tied externally on Teflon bolsters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Posterior rupture of the left ventricle has been a recognized complication since the inception of mitral valve surgery, and ironically, despite advances in cardiac anaesthesia, intensive care, and advances in virtually the entire spectrum of valvular heart surgeries, the outcome of left ventricular rupture has remained dismal with a reported mortality between 50-93% [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. The persisting 75% mortality warrants new insights into its prevention and management [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call