Abstract
One of the serious problems in studying organizations is the gap between the results of field experiments on cultural change, such as those described by Holmberg, and those of traditional laboratory studies. This gap seems so big that very few traditional laboratory methods are directly useful to the experimenter and observer in the field. Is it possible to close this gap between "pure science" and "field science" so that laboratory results can be used to understand and predict similar phenomena in the expanded context of field conditions?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
