Abstract

When designing models for predicting phytoplankton biomass or characterizing traits, it is useful to aggregate the myriad of species into a few biologically meaningful groups and focus on group-level attributes, the common practice being to combine phytoplankton species by functional types. However, biogeochemists and plankton ecologists debate the most applicable grouping for describing phytoplankton biomass patterns and predicting future community structure. Although trait-based approaches are increasingly being advocated, methods are missing for the generation of trait-based taxa as alternatives to functional types. Here we introduce such a method and demonstrate the usefulness of the resulting clustering with field data. We parameterize a Bayesian model of biomass dynamics and analyze long-term phytoplankton data collected at Station L4 in the Western English Channel between April 2003 and December 2009. We examine the tradeoffs encountered regarding trait characterization and biomass prediction when aggregating biomass by (1) functional types, (2) the trait-based clusters generated by our method, and (3) total biomass. The model conveniently extracted trait values under the trait-based clustering, but required well-constrained priors under the functional type categorization. It also more accurately predicted total biomass under the trait-based clustering and the total biomass aggregation with comparable root mean squared prediction errors, which were roughly five-fold lower than under the functional type grouping. Although the total biomass grouping ignores taxonomic differences in phytoplankton traits, it predicts total biomass change as well as the trait-based clustering. Our results corroborate the value of trait-based approaches in investigating the mechanisms underlying phytoplankton biomass dynamics and predicting the community response to environmental changes.

Highlights

  • IntroductionPhytoplankton communities are extremely diverse, with typically several thousands of species [1]

  • Phytoplankton communities are extremely diverse, with typically several thousands of species [1].When developing models to project biomass or characterize traits, it is convenient to aggregate species into a few biologically meaningful groups and focus on group-level characteristics [2,3,4,5]

  • We parameterize a Bayesian model of biomass dynamics and examine the tradeoffs encountered in connection with trait value characterization and biomass prediction when aggregating biomass according to (1) the functional types, (2) the trait-based clusters generated by our method, and (3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Phytoplankton communities are extremely diverse, with typically several thousands of species [1]. When developing models to project biomass or characterize traits, it is convenient to aggregate species into a few biologically meaningful groups and focus on group-level characteristics [2,3,4,5]. This greatly simplifies the model parameterization since it is much easier to deal with a few taxa than the multitude of individual species. We parameterize a Bayesian model of biomass dynamics and examine the tradeoffs encountered in connection with trait value characterization and biomass prediction when aggregating biomass according to (1) the functional types, (2) the trait-based clusters generated by our method, and (3). The group-level traits that we are interested in characterizing include the maximum growth rate, temperature and salinity sensitivity, and half-saturation constants for irradiance, nitrogen and silicate representing resource acquisition ability

Description of Data
21 December
Time plots of environmental variables at StationatL4Station betweenL4
Bayesian Model of Cluster-Level Biomass Dynamics
Description of the Trait-Based Clustering Method
Analyzing the Environmental Drivers of Species Occurrence
Clustering Using GMM and the E-M Algorithm
Analyzing the Environmental Controls of Species Occurrence
Implementation of the Trait-Based Clustering
Configuration
Time plots of log-biomass
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call