Abstract

BackgroundSurvival in temporally or spatially changing environments is a prerequisite for the perpetuation of a given species. In addition to genetic variation, the role of epigenetic processes is crucial in the persistence of organisms. For instance, mechanisms such as developmental flexibility enable the adjustment of the phenotype of a given individual to changing conditions throughout its development. However, the extent of factors other than genetic variability, like epigenetic processes, in the production of alternative phenotype and the consequences in realized ecological niches is still unclear.MethodsIn this study, we compared the extent of realized niches between asexual and sexual individuals from different environments. We used a trait-based ecology approach exploiting trophic and locomotive structures to infer the environment that each biotype actually used. More specifically, we compared the morphology of the all-female clonal and sperm-dependent fish Chrosomus eos-neogaeus to that of their sexual host species C. eos in common garden and natural conditions.ResultsTransfer from natural to controlled conditions resulted in a similar shift in measured morphology for clonal and sexual individuals suggesting comparable level of flexibility in both kinds of organisms. However, clonal, but not sexual, individuals displayed a consistent phenotype when reared in uniform conditions indicating that in absence of genetic variation, one phenotype corresponds to one niche. This contrasted with results from natural conditions where clones were morphologically as variable as sexual individuals within a sampled site. In addition, similar phenotypic changes for both clonal and sexual individuals were observed among the majority of sampled sites, indicating that they responded similarly to the same environments.DiscussionOur results indicated that clones can efficiently use different niches and may evolve in a range of environmental conditions comparable to that of a sexual species, thus underlying the importance of factors other than genetic variability, like epigenetic processes, for coping with environmental heterogeneity.

Highlights

  • Understanding the different factors underlying the development of phenotypic variation is of major importance in ecological and evolutionary biology, as such phenotypic variation enables organisms to survive and reproduce successfully in heterogeneous and fluctuating environments (Agrawal, 2001a; Price, Qvarnström & Irwin, 2003)

  • Analysis of variation of individuals in controlled conditions revealed that both clonal lineages displayed lower morphological variation than the group of sexual individuals (P < 0.012, Tukey honest significant difference” (HSD) post-hoc, Fig. 2)

  • The partition of morphological variation in natural conditions showed that plasticity promotes niche diversification in genetically identical individuals, allowing them to occupy a range of environmental conditions similar to that of sexual individuals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the different factors underlying the development of phenotypic variation is of major importance in ecological and evolutionary biology, as such phenotypic variation enables organisms to survive and reproduce successfully in heterogeneous and fluctuating environments (Agrawal, 2001a; Price, Qvarnström & Irwin, 2003). In addition to genetic variation, the role of epigenetic processes is crucial in the persistence of organisms Mechanisms such as developmental flexibility enable the adjustment of the phenotype of a given individual to changing conditions throughout its development. Clonal, but not sexual, individuals displayed a consistent phenotype when reared in uniform conditions indicating that in absence of genetic variation, one phenotype corresponds to one niche This contrasted with results from natural conditions where clones were morphologically as variable as sexual individuals within a sampled site. Discussion: Our results indicated that clones can efficiently use different niches and may evolve in a range of environmental conditions comparable to that of a sexual species, underlying the importance of factors other than genetic variability, like epigenetic processes, for coping with environmental heterogeneity

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call