Abstract

AbstractAn aerospace division studied works with many sophisticated and complex aerospace projects where requirements management is a necessity. This paper represents the results of a trade study into possible software tools for requirements management across the various division programs. The study began with a survey to program leadership and systems engineers about their handlings of requirements and their use of specific requirements tools. This survey allowed for the formulation of criteria within an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) of various commercial requirements software platforms. Through the pairwise comparisons of AHP, five software tools were selected and evaluated for feasible implementation across the various division program sizes. With data from the survey and results from the AHP, this trade study suggests that Jama will most appropriately fulfill the specific needs of the division. This is based on Jama's strong performance in aspects such as security, Excel integration, and file linking.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.