Abstract

An emerging vision for toxicity testing in the 21st century foresees in vitro assays assuming the leading role in testing for chemical hazards, including testing for carcinogenicity. Toxicity will be determined by monitoring key steps in functionally validated molecular pathways, using tests designed to reveal chemically-induced perturbations that lead to adverse phenotypic endpoints in cultured human cells. Risk assessments would subsequently be derived from the causal in vitro endpoints and concentration vs. effect data extrapolated to human in vivo concentrations. Much direct experimental evidence now shows that disruption of epigenetic processes by chemicals is a carcinogenic mode of action that leads to altered gene functions playing causal roles in cancer initiation and progression. In assessing chemical safety, it would therefore be advantageous to consider an emerging class of carcinogens, the epigenotoxicants, with the ability to change chromatin and/or DNA marks by direct or indirect effects on the activities of enzymes (writers, erasers/editors, remodelers and readers) that convey the epigenetic information. Evidence is reviewed supporting a strategy for in vitro hazard identification of carcinogens that induce toxicity through disturbance of functional epigenetic pathways in human somatic cells, leading to inactivated tumour suppressor genes and carcinogenesis. In the context of human cell transformation models, these in vitro pathway measurements ensure high biological relevance to the apical endpoint of cancer. Four causal mechanisms participating in pathways to persistent epigenetic gene silencing were considered: covalent histone modification, nucleosome remodeling, non-coding RNA interaction and DNA methylation. Within these four interacting mechanisms, 25 epigenetic toxicity pathway components (SET1, MLL1, KDM5, G9A, SUV39H1, SETDB1, EZH2, JMJD3, CBX7, CBX8, BMI, SUZ12, HP1, MPP8, DNMT1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, TET1, MeCP2, SETDB2, BAZ2A, UHRF1, CTCF, HOTAIR and ANRIL) were found to have experimental evidence showing that functional perturbations played “driver” roles in human cellular transformation. Measurement of epigenotoxicants presents challenges for short-term carcinogenicity testing, especially in the high-throughput modes emphasized in the Tox21 chemicals testing approach. There is need to develop and validate in vitro tests to detect both, locus-specific, and genome-wide, epigenetic alterations with causal links to oncogenic cellular phenotypes. Some recent examples of cell-based high throughput chemical screening assays are presented that have been applied or have shown potential for application to epigenetic endpoints.

Highlights

  • Somatic cells can develop long-lasting or multi-generational cellular phenotypes in response to a host of input signals originating from homeostatic physiological pathways, conditions of physiological stress, or abnormal cellular environments [1]

  • The findings suggest that up-regulated G9A is a “prometastatic” histone methyltransferase (HMT), via its regulation of a group of specific genes; other than confirming by chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP) that G9A binds to many of the specific promoter regions, and that H3K9me2 was present, no measurements of knockdown-specific chromatin features were made in this study in order to confirm the histone-modification-based mechanism of action in the specific tumour suppressor genes (TSG) suppressions

  • It may be possible that the interaction of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) with the H3K9 methylation writers and readers may favour the DNA segments with erroneously marked histones to be targeted by DNA methylation, this idea has not been tested, directly, nor have TSGs yet been demonstrated to be among the targets under these circumstances

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Somatic cells can develop long-lasting or multi-generational cellular phenotypes in response to a host of input signals originating from homeostatic physiological pathways, conditions of physiological stress, or abnormal cellular environments [1]. The choice of key molecular perturbations along the pathway requires solid, experimentally-confirmed insights into their causal linkages (essentiality in the AOP vocabulary), together with dose- and time-related contributions to adverse cellular outcomes Such acquired knowledge, gained in uncovering the linkages between exposure and phenotypic response, should be applied to the development of efficient tests that permit medium- to high-throughput chemical screening. It is expected that further refinements to characterizing hazards, based on dose-dependent perturbations to toxicity pathways, will provide a practical framework for making decisions concerning chemical safety With this provisional framework in view, it becomes important to assess whether our current understanding of toxin-induced epigenetic effects that drive cell transformation can provide a basis to develop mechanism-based toxicity testing suitable for regulatory decision-making according to the Tox paradigm

TSG Silencing Models in Cell Transformation
Arginine Methylation
Polycomb and Trithorax Group Proteins
Enhanced Expressions of the H3K9 Writers Contribute to Human Cell Oncogenesis
Induction of “Histone Methylation Injuries” and Passage into Cellular Memory
ATP-Dependent Nucleosome Remodeling
DNA Methylation
DNA Methylation Enzymes
MBD1-6
SETDB and BAZ2
The KAISO Protein Family
Experiments Creating Epigenetically Modified Promoters to Silence TSGs
CTCF and Control of Epigenetic Modifications in TSGs
Genome-Scale Epigenomic Changes
Non-Coding RNA
HOTAIR
MIR31HG
The “Epigenetic Progenitor” Hypothesis and Multi-Step Tumourigenesis
Brief Methodology
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call