Abstract
The proposal of human foveal splitting assumes a vertical meridian split in the foveal representation and the consequent contralateral projection of information in the two hemifields to the two hemispheres and has been shown to have important implications for visual word recognition. According to this assumption, in Chinese character recognition, the two halves of a centrally fixated character may be initially projected to and processed in different hemispheres. Here, we describe a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) investigation of hemispheric processing in Chinese character recognition, through examining semantic radical combinability effects in a character semantic judgment task. The materials used were a dominant type of Chinese character which consists of a semantic radical on the left and a phonetic radical on the right. Thus, according to the split fovea assumption, the semantic and phonetic radicals are initially projected to and processed in the right hemisphere and the left hemisphere, respectively. We show that rTMS over the left occipital cortex impaired the facilitation of semantic radicals with large combinability, whereas right occipital rTMS did not. This interaction between stimulation site and radical combinability reveals a flexible division of labor between the hemispheres in Chinese character recognition, with each hemisphere responding optimally to the information in the contralateral visual hemifield to which it has direct access. The results are also consistent with the split fovea claim, suggesting functional foveal splitting as a universal processing constraint in reading.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.