Abstract

This letter presents a triple-8-shaped transformer-based complementary oscillator. It features tiny area, wide tuning range (TR), electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), and low flicker phase noise (PN), combining the merits of both $LC$ -tank and ring oscillators. We identify that after suppressing the second-harmonic voltage by the complementary operation itself, the third-harmonic current entering the capacitive path is now the main cause of asymmetry in the rising and falling edges, leading to the $1/f$ noise upconversion. By tuning the capacitance ratio between gate and drain nodes of the switching transistors, it mitigates the third-harmonic voltage and introduces a specific gate–drain phase shift, reducing the $1/f^{3}$ PN. Fabricated in 22-nm FDSOI CMOS, the prototype occupies an area of 0.01 mm2 and achieves $1/f^{3}$ PN corner of 70 kHz, PN of −110 dBc/Hz @1MHz and Figure-of-Merit (FoM) of −182 dB at 9 GHz, 39% TR, resulting in the best FoM with normalized TR and area (FoMTA) of −214 dB@1 MHz.

Highlights

  • Saving the silicon area in IC design has always been attracting intensive research

  • This letter proposes a complementary oscillator using a triple-8shaped transformer, featuring simultaneously tiny area (0.01 mm2), wide-tuning range (TR) (39%), low 1/f 3 phase noise (PN) corner (70 kHz), and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)

  • We identify that the third-harmonic entering the capacitive path is the main cause of waveform asymmetries in a complementary oscillator since its second-harmonic voltage is suppressed by the complementary operation itself

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Saving the silicon area in IC design has always been attracting intensive research This is especially true for LC-tank oscillators since the passive devices cannot scale well with the technology advancements [1]–[5]. On the other hand, benefit from the CMOS technology scaling, occupying tiny area with wide tuning range (TR) and are not susceptible to magnetic pulling. Their phase noise (PN), especially 1/f 3 PN, is much worse than in the LC-tank oscillators (see Fig. 1), significantly limiting their application in emerging low-jitter systems, e.g., high-speed PAM4 signaling or WIFI-6E.

PROPOSED OSCILLATOR DESIGN
FLICKER NOISE REDUCTION MECHANISM
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.