Abstract

AbstractSeismicity in the Central Apennines is characterized by normal faulting with dip NE‐SW near 45°. If the stress at the hypocenter of the 2016 Norcia (Mw = 6.5) and 2009 L'Aquila (Mw = 6.3 on the Paganica fault) earthquakes originated only from stress transfer from previous historical events, the orientation of the principal stress axes would have been inconsistent with the observed tensional regime. The additional contribution of a regional stress is thus required, but Global Navigation Satellite System geodesy provides only stress rates. We empirically estimate a time multiplier for the regional stress rate, computed with a dense Global Navigation Satellite System network, such that the principal stress axes resulting from the sum of the stress transferred by previous events and the regional stress rate multiplied by the empirical temporal scale are consistent with normal faulting, both at the L'Aquila and Norcia hypocenters. Based on a Catalogue of 36 events of magnitude larger than 5.6, we estimate the total Coulomb stress at depths and along planes parallel to those of L'Aquila and Norcia. We provide evidence of an asymmetry of the Coulomb stress leading to a stress concentration near the hypocenter of the two events just prior of the 2009 and 2016 earthquakes. This stress anomaly disappeared after the two events. Similar stress patterns are observed for earlier events, which took place in 1461 at L'Aquila, 1703 on the Montereale plain, and in 1703 at Norcia/Valnerina. The 1997 sequence of Colfiorito exhibits a similar, anisotropic Coulomb stress pattern. Other areas with a similar stress anisotropy could be seismic gaps.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.