Abstract

Nowadays, climate change has become an increasingly important factor that influences the national development. In this paper, we propose the three-dimensional model based on dynamic weighting to measure national fragility, while taking into account a series of climatic factors like temperature, rainfall et al. Our model includes 20 indicators which can be divided into economic factors, social factors and environmental factors. We first divided all indicators into cost-type, benefit-type and moderate indicators, and normalized them based on different types of indicators. Then, combining modified entropy weight method and AHP, the weights of 20 indicators and three factors in the evaluation model are defined. In the three-dimensional evaluation model, we use the length of the evaluation curve to evaluate the national fragility and measure the balance of the three factors with the angle between the curve and the diagonal of the model. Moreover, since countries at different stages of development have different development focuses, we have developed an "S-type" function to dynamically measure the different emphasis on the degree of national fragility and the balance of the three evaluation factors. Then, we calculate the comprehensive fragility index by giving different weights for the degree of national fragility and the balance of the three factors. Finally, we use two different countries which are China and Sudan to verify the rationality of the model. The results show that our model can reasonably measure the fragility of countries in different development levels, which also proves its adaptability and practicability.

Highlights

  • A country or state is fragile when it doesn’t have enough capacity to supply the fundamental essentials to its individuals

  • Sudan is more fragile than China

  • For measuring the impact of environmental factors such as climate on the national fragility, this paper establishes a three-dimensional model based on dynamic weighting to evaluate the national fragility

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A country or state is fragile when it doesn’t have enough capacity to supply the fundamental essentials to its individuals. It is essential for every country to assess the national fragility which is used to develop better national development plans and accelerate the country's economic development. Many organizations evaluate it mainly through a country's social and economic indicators as well as government capabilities. The FFP organization measures the fragile degree of a country through 12 indicators, that is, Security Apparatus, Factionalized Elites, and Group Grievance et al (CIFP, 2006). CIFP and other Index systems such as FFP, CRISE and CSP measure the fragile degree of a country do not take into account the impact of climate change on national fragility (Carment, Prest & Samy, 2009; Stewart & Brown, 2009; Marshall & Cole, 2014). Sanín studied seven kinds of assessment indexes that measure national fragility and criticized the national performance index because almost no information about performance ranking was collected (Sanín, 2011)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.