Abstract
Scalable and secure implementation of central bank digital currencies (CBDC) has been a challenge. Blockchains provide high operator-independent security and enable central banks to outsource CBDC operations while retaining control over the amount of circulating money. Scalability of blockchain depends on the possibility of decomposing the blockchain. We study how the choice of money scheme: accounts, bills, or unspent transaction outputs (UTXOs) influences the existence of secure and decomposable blockchain implementations of CBDC. We give formal definitions to money schemes, their decompositions, atomic decompositions inspired from the properties of blockchain implementations. For our formalism, we use tools from universal algebra and category theory. We present a general decomposition theory and conditions under which money schemes have atomic decompositions. Bill money schemes meet these conditions but account and UTXO schemes do not. Bill schemes enable scalable and secure implementations of CBDC while the more traditional schemes have some issues.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.