Abstract

This study investigated the responses of gas bubbles in water, “viscous water” or “lung surfactant” exposed to “positive-only” or “negative-only” pressure pulses. The computational results obtained were compared to the in vivo experimental findings of Bailey et al. (1996), for the thresholds for, and extents of, biological damage endpoints in Drosophila larvae and mouse lungs exposed to similar pressure pulses. It is shown that, if cavitation were the mechanism responsible for these biologic effects, the two pulse types would be expected to produce very different thresholds and amounts of damage unless: 1. the bubbles involved were larger than the linear resonance radius, or 2. the cavitational activity were located within a fraction of a wavelength of an air-tissue interface. A noncavitational, acoustic force mechanism for the effects also is considered. Finally, it is suggested that the mechanical index may require modification when the focus of the acoustic field lies near an air-tissue interface. (E-mail: cchurch@olemiss.edu)

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.