Abstract

Large basis set coupled cluster calculations, with corrections for core/valence, atomic spin−orbit, and scalar relativistic effects, have been used to determine the atomization energies of furan (1A1, C4H4O), tetrahydrofuran (1A, C4H8O), and the THF-2-yl (2A, C4H8O) and THF-3-yl (2A, C4H8O) radicals. For furan and tetrahydrofuran, where gas-phase experimental data is available, the level of agreement between experiment and theory is very good. The 0 K heats of formation (kcal/mol) for the four systems are ΔHf(furan) = −4.6 ± 0.5 (calcd) vs −5.2 ± 0.2 (exptl), ΔHf(tetrahydrofuran) = −37.6 ± 0.7 (calcd) vs −37.6 ± 0.2 (exptl), ΔHf(THF-2-yl) = 5.1 ± 1.0 (calcd), and ΔHf(THF-3-yl) = 8.9 ± 1.0 (calcd). At 298 K the comparable values are ΔHf(furan) = −7.7 ± 0.5 (calcd) vs −8.3 ± 0.2 (exptl), ΔHf(tetrahydrofuran) = −44.0 ± 0.5 (calcd) vs −44.0 ± 0.2 (exptl), ΔHf(THF-2-yl) = −0.5 ± 1.0 (calcd) and ΔHf(THF-3-yl) = 3.6 ± 1.0 (calcd). The principal limitation on the accuracy of the composite coupled cluster approach followed in this work is the high cost of large basis set calculations on chemical systems that lack exploitable elements of symmetry. Three parametrized methods, G2, G3, and CBS-Q, were also found to be in good agreement with experiment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.