Abstract
The correct detection of negations is essential to the performance of sentiment analysis tools. The evaluation of such tools is currently conducted through the use of corpora as an opportunistic approach. In this paper, we advocate using a different evaluation approach based on a set of intentionally built sentences that include negations, which aim to highlight those tools’ vulnerabilities. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, we propose a basic testset of such sentences. We employ that testset to evaluate six popular sentiment analysis tools (with eight lexicons) available as packages in the R language distribution. By adopting a supervised classification approach, we show that the performance of most of these tools is largely unsatisfactory.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
