Abstract

Multisensory learning to read involves, to a large extent, learning to write. A major problem in the initial teaching of handwriting is preventing children from producing reversed letters, especially when the reversed letters are identical to other letters. Torres et al. (2021) offer an efficient method for remediating this problem. Here, we analyze the reversals in their writing data, obtained on Brazilian first-graders (Mage= 6.0 years). Surprisingly, this analysis led to the observation that the first graders almost systematically reverse both the letters b and d in the particular copying conditions (the students look at one letter at a time for 3 s, then immediately after they had to write it while blindfolded). We first describe succinctly and discuss three models susceptible to account for reversal writing, with the aim to question their capacity of account for the curious observation just mentioned. The three models respectively attribute a major role to 1) initial (perceptive) mirror equivalence, 2) intra-hemispheric transfer, 3) orientation of the letters. Because none of the three models examined accounts convincingly for the observation, we accommodated and specified Model 2, adding also a major idea of Model 3. The resulting model assumes that the mirror-letter reversed image representation (b for d and vice-versa) is strongly activated in the right cerebral hemisphere, and that the top-down processes originating from this hemisphere were exacerbated by the eyes closed condition. Of course, this post-hoc and speculative model should be tested in other conditions and with other children.

Highlights

  • Knowledge is often acquired through reading and transmitted through writing

  • The children were recruited in Natal (Brazil), and tested in September for the Baseline, in October just after the Intervention, and about 120 days after in February of the following academic year

  • Calculating for each child a percentage of reversal for left- and right-oriented letters, the paired t-test confirms the higher reversal of the left-versus rightoriented letters, t(116) 7.37, p < 0.001

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Knowledge is often acquired through reading and transmitted through writing. Much research supports a unidirectional relationship from reading to writing (Ahmed et al, 2014; Kim et al, 2018). Ahmed et al.’s modeling suggested that a unidirectional reading-to-writing model was better at the word and text levels of analysis. Their modeling revealed that a bidirectional model best fit the sentence-level data. For learners who are beginning to read—typically preschoolers or first graders at the beginning of the school year—, and at the letter-level, the relationship between reading (or letter recognition) and writing might be somewhat different

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call