Abstract

The method of images is tested by comparing two ways of calculating the polarization energy in crystalline fullerene C60 and in bulk amorphous polyethylene (PE): (i) treating the whole molecular material microscopically, and (ii) replacing part of the material by a uniform dielectric continuum of the same relative permittivity. The method of images is accurate to within 5% once the distance of the charge from the surface of the dielectric continuum exceeds about twice the average spacing between the polarizable units in the molecular material. For C60 crystals the method of images always overestimates the magnitude of the polarization energy, partly because it ignores the reduction in the relative permittivity of the dielectric continuum near its surface. For amorphous PE the method of images can overestimate or underestimate the true result, depending on the local density around the charge.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.