Abstract
Trading of twelve technical system is simulated for a portfolio of twelve commodities from 1978 to 1984 in order to test for market disequilibrium. Results differ substantially by trading system. Seven systems produced significant gross returns. Four of the twelve trading sytems produced significant net returns and significant risk-adjusted returns. These results show that disequilibrium models are a better description of short-run futures price movements than the random walk model. They also suggest that there may be additional causes of disequilibrium beyond transaction costs and risk aversion.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
