Abstract
Ground-coupled ejector cooling (GCEC) systems have been introduced to solve the air-coupled ejector cooling (ACEC) systems problems. To date, no research study is dedicated to compare the GCEC and the ACEC systems and determine the relative payback period of the GCEC system vs. the ACEC system. Furthermore, almost all the previous studies simulated the GCEC systems by elementary models. Therefore, a comprehensive simulation is conducted to assess the techno-economic performance of a GCEC system. The model consists of the ejector and the borehole heat exchanger submodels. The first section of the results compares the ACEC system and the GCEC system during a cooling season. The seasonal coefficient of performance of the GCEC system is 83% higher than that of the ACEC system. The maximum building load per borehole heat exchanger unit length is 12.4, 17.5, and 21.6 W/m when the soil thermal conductivity is 1.40, 2.45, 3.50 W/(m.K), respectively. The second section of the results compares the relative payback period of the GCEC systems vs. the ACEC system for different values of soil thermal conductivities, borehole cost, and natural gas price. The relative payback period of the GCEC system vs. the ACEC system can be as low as five years.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
