Abstract
This study proposes a taxonomy for asset management companies to facilitate conceptualization, classification, and measurement. Accordingly, the study qualitatively analyzes variations in the types of assets transferred to asset management companies, the transfer pricing mechanism, and the extent of risk conveyance. The study uses a cross-country setting to analyze differences in corporate structure, resolution mandate, capital structure, and legal status of asset management companies. Through country-specific case illustrations, the study discusses the merits and demerits of different classification features. The study develops a list of feasible design feature combinations for an asset management company.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
